Talk:Biological Weapons Convention/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
This is Archive 1 covering 2020 and earlier.
Untitled
Is the text of the BWC available at Wikisource? If it is this page should link there and if it isnt it would be much appreciated if someone would add it. freestylefrappe 23:57, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
What is an "insrument"?
Not to be a smartass, but what is an insrument? I don't know if it's just a word I don't know, or if it's a typo. I googled it trying to find "insrument" but didn't come up with anything that made sense...."The BWC has 165 States Parties. The Republic of China (Taiwan) had deposited an insrument of ratification before the changeover of the United Nations seat to the People's Republic of China." Can someone please clarify or fix if it's not correct?192.33.240.95 (talk) 19:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- It's a typo (now fixed) - should be "instrument of ratification." In this case, and "instrument" is a legal instrument, that is, a document whose deposit has the legal effect of bringing the treaty into force. NPguy (talk) 20:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Updating the BTWC and relevant pages
Hello,
I am a postgraduate student working for a disarmament research centre in the UK. My project is on biological weapons prohibition and how it can be comprehensively achieved.
As part of the project I am looking to significantly update the BTWC page and its relevant pages (such as VEREX, CBMs,). This will include an historical overview of the BTWC progression as well as analysis of on-going issues.
If anyone else is considering updating this page please get in touch with me. Regards, Richard Elliott,
Bradford Disarmament Research Centre
Source for the following
There seems to be no source for the following content and seems to be made from sensasionalist bullshit.
Even though the U.S. has signed this treaty, they are still making and stockpiling tons of man made and altered viruses to become extremely deadly. The United States also made an altered smallpox virus and were it ever leaked out, there could be worldwide death.
Thanks.
- I doubt it would be 'tons'. Russia and the US currently have stockpiles of smallpox - it is an acknowledged fact - but nobody desperate for them to get rid of them, since samples are needed to develop vaccines (and consequently their retention is legal under the non-hostile use clause) Kransky 09:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
"Censored by media"
"written by Alison Walker-Baird and censored from the major news medias"
Okay, I may not have much regard for news outlets at all, but there is no evidence provided for this statement. If there was 'censorship' poster needs to either cite evidence. Epthorn 18:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- The argument does not belong here; this article is concerned with the Treaty itself, not biological weapons. Kransky 01:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
BWC drafted by the British?
Really? I can't find any evidence for this. The citation in the entry links to a BBC article written by a TV producer who at no point states or claims that the UK drafted the Convention.
86.25.144.195 (talk) 11:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC) Quickpint
Yeah, I don't see it on the link either. The link mentions that the British could have been the first people to use biowarfare, but it doesn't say they submitted the first draft for the convention. I'm not going to delete the statement about the draft because I don't know much about this topic, but could someone find a good link for it?
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Biological Weapons Convention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091204154750/http://www.un.org:80/disarmament/WMD/Bio/BioSecondPageBWC.shtml to http://www.un.org/disarmament/WMD/Bio/BioSecondPageBWC.shtml
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.iss.europa.eu/nc/actualites/actualite/select_category/21/article/enforcing-non-proliferation-the-european-union-and-the-2006-btwc-review-conference/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Biological Weapons Convention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.un.org/disarmament/WMD/Bio/BioSecondPageBWC.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070621042913/http://boudewijndejonge.googlepages.com/Institutional_governance_OPBW.pdf to http://boudewijndejonge.googlepages.com/Institutional_governance_OPBW.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)