Talk:Biological pacemaker
Latest comment: 4 years ago by NapoliRoma in topic Needs a better lead?
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Needs a better lead?
editThe lead currently appears to describe the natural workings of the heart. The article itself appears to be about using biological materials to act as an artificial pacemaker for the heart.
Could someone please verify or refute this assertion -- and either way, could someone make a more appropriate lead? Thanks, NapoliRoma (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- This was fixed a while back -- thanks, LostRaven! NapoliRoma (talk) 22:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)