Talk:Bioproduct

Merge Biobased product here

Other then a definition by the US in 2002, do these articles really address a different topic? No sense in having two articles with this amount of overlap. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Merge opposite

I believe it would actually be more appropriate to merge "Bioproducts" into "Biobased Products" as bioproducts is an adapted name to shorten the term. As the proper term is biobased products, this page should be entered into the "Biobased Products" page. 75.145.183.121 (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC) Crystal

Agreed

I think these pages should be merged as they essentially cover the same thing, although the Bioproducts page is better written I think Biobased Products is a more widely used term so I think we should go ahead and merge Bioproducts with the Biobased products page.Incrediblehunk (talk) 15:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Disagree

I think the Biobased Products page is written strictly following the definition in 2002 and it does not include all of the conventional biobased products which have been around for a long time (more than centuries, long before 2002). The above definition was more politically (not scientifically) motivated and written more to encourage investment and growth in emerging or "new" biobased products (it does not even include all of the new, if you see the biopreferred program) and it completely ignores all of the "old" biobased products. The bioproducts definition and the page on the other hand clearly includes all of the "old" and the "new" biobased products, as it scientifically should. If we need to keep the 2002 definition, let us keep them separate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bioguru1 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bioproducts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091229061153/http://www1.eere.energy.gov:80/biomass/pdfs/final_2006_vision.pdf to http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/final_2006_vision.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090826031901/http://nrel.gov/learning/re_bioproducts.html to http://www.nrel.gov/learning/re_bioproducts.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721032842/http://www.biopreferred.gov/Default.aspx?SMSESSION=NO/ to http://www.biopreferred.gov/Default.aspx?SMSESSION=NO/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106155454/http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/ to http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)