Talk:Biosphere (musician)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Move and cleanup
editThis page should be moved to Biosphere (musician) since it's not a band, just one guy. 80.203.115.12 14:03, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Who's going to? --Gravity Control
Never mind, I already did. --Gravity Control
Ok, so, I changed a lot. Mostly it was just spelling, grammar, and general usage of the English language, but I feel that there are a couple key issues that need to be addressed: - IMHO, Biosphere's early albums are in no way comparable to Aphex Twin's SAW 85-92. SAW stands as an amateur work, and enjoys rather sub-par production. Biosphere and come and gone from Bel Canto & Bleep at this point, he was in no way an amateur. That; and his production skills on his early work trumped those of RDJ. The comparison is, at best, forced. I left the comparison to SAW-II later in this article, as I feel it makes a little bit more sense, but I still feel the comparison is meaningless. Unless someone steps up to defend the inclusion of a reference to SAW II, I intend to remove it when I find something better to stick in its place. The reference to Coil, actually, makes a great deal of sense, and I feel that it should stay. - I don't feel that Biosphere's early work was ambient techno by any means, and changed that reference to be ambient house. Ambient Techno, as I see it, refers to things such as Monolake's "Gravity", Plastikman's "Consumed", and just about anything on the Basic Channel label with the possible exception of Scion. Again, I feel this comparison to be forced. A comparison with the ambient-house stylings of The Orb makes a great deal more sense to me.
There remains a lot to be fixed in this article - I think the trivia section needs work - but I'll get to that soon. Sorry if these edits made anyone angry, feel free to argue my points as always. Kobresia 06:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
The chronology in the "1991-Present" section could be improved. A 2006 album is mentioned before the 2004 performance in Detroit, for example. bneely 18:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, agreed. I'll get on that. Kobresia 20:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Kobresia...hmm. Isn't that a flower? Because, I don't know. I wouldn't call a song something like Jonquil or Daisy. --Gravity Control
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 22:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Biosphere (musician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120204141803/http://www.junkmedia.org/index.php?i=193 to http://www.junkmedia.org/index.php?i=193
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090420132604/http://unsound.pl:80/en/festival/news/2008 to http://unsound.pl/en/festival/news/2008
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050114103052/http://www.mic.no/mic.nsf/doc/art2003072514223315188372 to http://www.mic.no/mic.nsf/doc/art2003072514223315188372
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060429045502/http://www.themilkfactory.co.uk:80/interviews/biosphereiw.htm to http://www.themilkfactory.co.uk/interviews/biosphereiw.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 3 November 2016 (UTC)