Talk:Biota (taxonomy)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Boxes

edit


Biota
Scientific classification
Superdomain:
Biota
Empires
Eukaryota - Eucarya
Prokaryota - Monera
Aphanobionta - Virus

Biota
Scientific classification
Superdomain:
Biota
Domains
Eukaryota - Eucarya
Bacteria - Eubacteria
Archaea - Archaebacteria
Acytota - Virus

Biota
Scientific classification
Superdomain:
Biota
Superkingoms
Metacarya - Multicellular
Protista - Protista
Bacteria - Eubacteria
Archaea - Archaebacteria
Virus - Virus

Biota
Scientific classification
Superdomain:
Biota
Kingoms
Animalia - Fauna (Metazoa)
Plantae - Flora (Metaphyta)
Fungi - Eumycota
Chromista - Promycota
Archezoa - Giarda
Protista - Protozoa
Bacteria - Eubacteria
Archaea - Archaebacteria
Virus - Virus


Top

edit

I have never seen this rank or taxon used formally. I really don't think it's standard, and I don't think we should treat it as such. As such, I'm removing the category for the time being, until the article has some substantitation. The systems above are all valid - though Archezoa is obsolete, and stole Chromista's color :) - except viruses definitely don't appear in the published versions of at least two. I'm not really sure what their point is, though. Josh 06:06, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

"Biota" reminds me of kids who put "Earth, Solar System, Milky Way, etc" at the end of addresses. Anyway, we already have a long discussion on the various systems of kingdoms/empires/domains at Kingdom (biology). Gdr 23:24, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Biota or Bionta

edit

The taxon created by Walton in 1930 was actually called Bionta, not Biota. I have no idea who invented the other name. Vasconicus (talk) 05:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I believe these are distinct. Check the external links on this article, and you'll see "Biota" is listed, but "Bionta" is not. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Bionta should probably be merged here, as a different name for the same concept. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 23:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Or maybe not... it could just represent all cellular life. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 23:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Biota (taxonomy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply