Talk:Bird-and-flower painting
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Moved
editMoved this page to "Bird-and-flower painting" as that is the name by which it is best known in English. As a rather important term in Oriental art, it's a pity that the article languished at its former location for so long. We also need more links pointing to this page. Bathrobe (talk) 03:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bird-and-flower painting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081002162351/http://www.dia.org/the_collection/overview/viewobject.asp?objectid=57885 to http://www.dia.org/the_collection/overview/viewobject.asp?objectid=57885
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Weird sentence in the lead
edit«It originated in the Tang dynasty where it gained popularity, matured at the of the Tang dynasty and during the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period, and fully reached its peak during the Song dynasty, where it clearly became socially relevant in Chinese culture»
Problems with this sentence: 1. «It originated in the Tang dynasty and matured in the Tang dynasty». Weird repeat. 2. «At the of the Tang dynasty». Very bad grammar.
I would change it myself, but I don’t know enough about this topic. Henrik242E (talk) 16:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Had a go. Johnbod (talk) 02:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
POV-removal of Vietnam
editI wrote this section on my wife's laptop a few minutes after this edit, but the laptop crashed. Back in 2019 a user removed all references to Vietnam from this article, no reason was given, they just removed content. This removal was odd because this very much is a concept in Vietnamese culture (Internet Archive's Wayback Machine). As far as I can tell that edit had no basis in reality other than to push a POV where Vietnam is not a part of the Sinosphere. I had more examples when I originally wrote this section before hitting "Save", but I can't remember all the sources I consulted. --Donald Trung (talk) 13:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Bird-and-flower in a Persian/Mughal context
editSuggestion: add a section on bird-and-flower paintings in Persia.
There isn't yet an English-language article for gol-o-morg
You could include stuff from the Topkapi and Diez Albums (especially Bahram Mirza).
File:Exotic bird (foreground) and falcon (background).jpg
_and_falcon_(background).jpg){kind=link}
