Talk:Birkenhead Public Library/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of July 12, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Generally good. The tone is a little pedantic however; try to spice it up with more interest, and change some of the passive voice to the active voice.

2. Factually accurate?: Ample references.

3. Broad in coverage?: Generally good. The "Services" section mentions "children's programmes, reference, interloans, internet access, printer-copier, and housebound deliveries." Perhaps elaborate on the other services? On another note, the number of sections is slightly high, but not too major of a problem.

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: An impressive number of images!

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 12 July 2008 (UTC)