Talk:Birlinn (publisher)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Advert?

edit

Having just read this article for the first time ever, it appears to me that it no longer looks like an advert. From the edit history, it certainly did when the tag was put in place. I see that there are possible issues of COI regarding most of the edits made since, so am loathe to just remove the tag without flagging this first. Are there any objections to removing the tag? Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Polygon

edit

Was the Polygon mentioned in this article originally an imprint of Edinburgh University Press? Or is it a different one?--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 05:11, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Birlinn (publisher). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply