This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Looking around at information and sources about this barracks, it would appear that it is referred to as Birr Barracks far more frequently than Crinkill Barracks. On Google Birr Barracks gets more hits (103k) than Crinkill Barracks (21k), and in the British newspapers archives Birr Barracks gets thousands of results in comparison to a handful for Crinkill/Crinkle. Even in recent coverage here, here, and here, it is referred to as Birr Barracks.
I think it's time for the article to reflect the more common name? Smirkybec (talk) 21:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Given the conversation here and of the WikiProject Ireland talk page, we have a small but relatively conclusive support for the move, so I'm going to be bold :) thanks all Smirkybec (talk) 09:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
