Talk:Bitterne

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merge

edit

I am against the proposed merge of articles suggested it would cause a loss of information in many cases and an overloading of the main page. Notably a similar set of proposals was made by an anonymous user to disrupt the Portsmouth page and those of its schools information is here and also here -- Drappel 21:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree. This article is currently a stub, but there is a large amount of encyclopedic information that could be added about Bitterne, most of which would be irrelevant in the Southampton article pcrtalk 23:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oppose Merge

edit

Indeed, whole books have been written on select areas of Southampton, they all have long histories. Supposed 03:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

History section (relevance)

edit

The history section contains a lot of references to the history of places that are technically outside of Bitterne and which have their own pages (Townhill Park, Bitterne Manor, Midanbury etc - I'm not sure if these references are useful here. Playclever (talk) 22:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bitterne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bitterne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply