Talk:Bitumen-based fuel
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Bearian in topic Merger proposal
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merger proposal
edit- I propose merging the brand name of Orimulsion into the generic Bitumen-based fuel. Bearian (talk) 18:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Beagel (talk) 18:39, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. A merger would only be appropriate if the primary usage of "Bitumen-based fuel" refers to Orimulsion. Since there are other fuels that could be described as Bitumen-based, including synthetic crude, a merger would violate WP:PRECISE. G. C. Hood (talk) 19:57, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. we should cover the topic in general and not to promote certain brands. E.g. we don't have an article title Prozac which is the most famous brand of that drug but we have instead of this a title Fluoxetine which is more brand-neutral. Beagel (talk) 09:30, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support Orimulsion should be a section inside the Bitumen-based fuels article. We can make a precise redirect of Orimulsion to the Orimulsion section of the article of the form article#section. SageGreenRider (talk) 12:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Bearian, any objection to this merge discussion being closed now as no consensus? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Boleyn, no problem. Let's move on. Bearian (talk) 13:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Notability tag
editKingturtle, I have removed the 2008 notability tag after 2 AfDs closed as no consensus. Feel free to revert me if you disagree. Boleyn (talk) 16:22, 18 July 2015 (UTC)