Talk:BizX

Latest comment: 4 years ago by DavidCary in topic Literally not a single RS

Please expand this article from these sources

edit

There are sources to help expand this article. For instance:

  • BizXchange - Google News Search
  • BizXchange - Google Books Search
  • BizXchange - Google Scholar
  • "Automotive industries interview with Edward Fitzgerald, founder of the BizXchange". (please expand the citation)
  • bizxchange -site:wikipedia.org - Bing News

Peaceray (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Correct name format? Also, advert?

edit
  1. Is it BizX or BIZX? I see both in search results.
  2. The article, or part of it, seems like an {{advert}}.

Zeniff (talk) 04:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BizX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Literally not a single RS

edit

This article presently has literally zero RSes. Thalia42 notes that they own Slashdot and SourceForge - so if we can find literally zero evidence for BizX themselves passing WP:NCORP, should they be redirected to their notable subsidiary? Thalia42, can you find any sources on BizX that pass RS muster? - David Gerard (talk) 10:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

I added citations from Forbes & LATimes & a thesis. I have no attachment to the article, just wandered here from Slashdot. --Thalia42 (talk) 17:53, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
I support merging and redirecting this article to Slashdot or SourceForge, to comply with WP:INHERITORG guideline. The citations from Thalia42 can be merged into that article. If we later collect enough references, we could unmerge/split and revert back to this article at that time. --DavidCary (talk) 04:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply