Talk:Bjaðmunjo Mýrjartaksdóttir/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Caponer (talk · contribs) 17:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Brianann MacAmhlaidh, I will undertake a thorough and comprehensive review and re-review of this article within the next 48 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime. -- Caponer (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Brianann MacAmhlaidh, I've completed my review and re-review and find that your article meets GA criteria, but I do have a few comments that should be addressed prior to its passage. Thanks again! -- Caponer (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Lede

• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, the lede of this article adequately defines Bjaðmunjo, establishes the necessary context for Bjaðmunjo, and explains why Bjaðmunjo is notable.
• The template is formatted well, its contents are cited within the prose and by the references below.
• Consider wiki-linking "Old Norse" and "Gaelic".

• Done.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

• Remove the extra "Sigurðr" mention from the final sentence of the paragraph.

• Done.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

• The lede is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.

Background

• The map of locations relating to Bjaðmunjo's life and times are licensed CC BY-SA 4.0 and is therefore acceptable for use here.
• This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.

Marriage

• The image of the excerpt from folio 32r of Bodleian Library is released into the public domain and is therefore free to use here.
• This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.

Ramifications

• This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no comments or questions for this section.

Brianann MacAmhlaidh, thank you for addressing my above concerns. Upon my review and re-review of your article, I find that it more than meets GA criteria and hereby pass it to GA status. Thanks again for all your tremendous work on this article and for your continued contributions to Wikipedia! -- Caponer (talk) 20:59, 1 March 2015 (UTC)