 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Notability
editDoes Blåhøi really warrant a Wikipedia article? As far as I can tell there is nothing notable about this specific mountain that justifies the existence of this article. I am considering nominating the article for deletion unless notability (WP:NOTE) can be demonstrated Mrmatiko (talk) 18:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have to agree here. It is a peak of interest to climbers, but there's nothing really THAT notable about it. I added in some references but there's really nothing too special about it as compared to other peaks (i.e. height, geological formations, etc.). I can find no news articles or anything in Norwegian either. Anfornum (talk) 19:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editI propose to merge Blåhø (Vågå) into Blåhøi. These are duplicate entries, but the first is misspelled, so probably wasn't caught. The page contains several photographs that might be of interest to the Mountains WikiProject group, so it would be a shame to lose them. Anfornum (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
REDIRECT APPLIED
editThe merge was withdrawn in favour of a redirect. This article was a duplicate of Blåhø (Vågå) and Blåhøe. Blåhøe is the main article, so this one is now redirected to that page. Discussed and decide not to delete due to spelling issues. Anfornum (talk) 21:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- You have to reference them being duplicates. There seems to be many, see [1]. Geschichte (talk) 22:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)