Talk:Black-winged myna
A fact from Black-winged myna appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Black-winged starling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100324114958/http://www.worldbirdnames.org/n-sugarbirds.html to http://www.worldbirdnames.org/n-sugarbirds.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Black-winged starling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727213244/http://www.resource-ecology.org/resources/publications/2000_Balen%2CPrins_StatusAndDistributionOfTheEndemicBaliStarling.pdf to http://www.resource-ecology.org/resources/publications/2000_Balen%2CPrins_StatusAndDistributionOfTheEndemicBaliStarling.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Justification for new articles?
editGood afternoon, Black-winged starling (Acridotheres melanopterus) has recently been split into three species, black-winged myna (Acridotheres melanopterus), grey-rumped myna (Acridotheres tertius), and grey-rumped starling (Acridotheres tricolor) by BirdLife, though other major taxonomic authorities have yet to follow. Do these subspecies justify separate pages, or is this one enough?