Talk:Black Flag, Western Australia

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Flag, Western Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110312055951/http://members.westnet.com.au/caladenia/ghosttowns/B.pdf to http://members.westnet.com.au/caladenia/ghosttowns/B.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

True reason for Black Flags Name

Prospector Norman Sligo claims to have discovered the Black Flag goldfield by finding a floater nugget in 1893 and explains the area was named such due to the hills and flats being coated with black ironstone wash, in his book Mates and Gold ISBN 0 85905 024 6 published 1980 pages 42 and 43. I have tried adding this information to the wiki page but it has been immediately removed even though it has been correctly citated and quoted word for word from the book. Wikipedia has little hope of being a relevant source of information when it is impossible to remove false content from a page and replace it with correct and accurate information. Zoontag (talk) 02:42, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Truth and False is irrelevent, the point that needs to be understood is whether WP:RS are available for claims for or against an explanation of a historically unretrievable item such as who or why a place is named. JarrahTree 02:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)