Talk:Black Rock Mining
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Questionable sentence
edit- "Unlike burning fossil fuels, geothermal energy emits no greenhouse gases, pollution or hazardous wastes."
What is this sentence doing here? Shouldn't this be in Geothermal power or somewhere else? I think having this sentence here makes the article seem like it's pushing a POV that geothermal is good. This article should just talk about Green Rock Energy, not the benefits of geothermal power. Thoughts? Fleetflame 05:30, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- I felt that the sentence helped to provide context and assisted with the issue of notability of the article. But if it is causing a problem feel free to remove it. Johnfos (talk) 02:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Green Rock Energy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091009203137/http://www.pesa.com.au/publications/pesa_news/mar_07/pesanews_8628.html to http://www.pesa.com.au/publications/pesa_news/mar_07/pesanews_8628.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)