Talk:Black cuckoo-dove/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wretchskull (talk · contribs) 16:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

A rather small article. No need to wait long to get a review.

Taxonomy and systematics

• Link subspecies.

Done.

Vocalizations

• Is there an audio file of the vocalizations available online? That would definitely be useful.

Added xeno-canto link.

Behavior and ecology

• Link subcanopy.

Done.

General

• The article is neutral and does not contain any ongoing edit wars or discussions.
• The lede image is appropriately licensed.
• Broadness, neutrality and WP:SUMMARY are met.
• Anything of significance here?

No, but I've done a (significant) bit of searching and added some more taxonomy.

References

• No copyvio found
• Ref 1 and 7 are exactly the same.

Merged.

• Spotchecks:
  • Jobling ref supports all cited text.
  • IOC ref supports all cited text (ref 3a). As for ref 3b, I assume that the fact that there isn't a comment about subspecies means that there are none for that particular species.
  • Avibase ref supports all cited text.
  • The Gibbs et al. book needs pages each time it is cited. Perhaps convert them to shortened footnotes and put the book in a bibliography section. AGF that it supports all cited text.
  • Baptista et al. ref supports all cited text.
  • IUCN ref supports all cited text.
  • Kaszewska et al. ref supports all cited text.

@AryKun: Ping me when you're done. Wretchskull (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

@Wretchskull:, I've addressed all your concerns. AryKun (talk) 07:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

@AryKun: The article has been promoted to GA. Wretchskull (talk) 08:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)