Talk:Black lung disease
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Black lung disease.
|
Category | The following sources contain public domain or freely licensed material that may be incorporated into this article:
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2019 and 2 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tylerwr1.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
MSHA Sampling for Black Lung
editAs noted in Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 70: "Mandatory Health Standards--Underground Coal Mines," The Mine Health and Safety Administration is taking steps to monitor and reduce miners' exposure to coal dust. Would be nice to see that reflected in the article. I'm iffy about editing myself, though I may later if I gain confidence to do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.224.105.103 (talk) 08:40, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Lay expert.
editDoes this really need a citation tag? Id be happier seeing it removed. Simply because, well, being a lay expert would basically require no one to have deemed you an actual expert, which by definition would mean theres no source to it. I honestly cant recall ever seeing that phrase dealt with on wikipedia before. 74.132.249.206 (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Signs & Symptoms
editExertional dyspnea, productive cough with inky-black sputum, and recurrent respiratory infections are common symptoms. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridgeside01 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ Fifth Edition : Diseases of the Human Body
Biased
editIt appears this page is heavily biased in favor of the coal industry. It would be nice if someone could please take a few minutes and clean it up. Ahraaar (talk) 13:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 25 January 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 14:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Coalworker's pneumoconiosis → Black lung disease – This is the WP:COMMONNAME Iamreallygoodatcheckerst@lk 03:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nominator's reason. --Killuminator (talk) 14:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support. WP:MEDTITLE emphasizes that the
scientific or recognised medical name
should be preferred to colloquial names. I checked Google Scholar results (2010–present) for"black lung" disease
andcoalworker's pneumoconiosis
and obtained comparable numbers for each; given that there's no clear common name among the scholarly sources, I think it's best to use the general-usage WP:COMMONNAME as the tiebreaking factor. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 17:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Spring 2024 OSH Courses Projects
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2024 and 29 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dhemrick99 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Xheckma0 (talk) 04:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)