Talk:Blackarachnia

Only Sideways

Only sideways changes sides more than her but, besides that, what's prominent about her personality as a maximal? What is prominent about her personality as a predacon? Usually that's part of characters descriptions... but her description ignores that...

Affiliation

Problem is you can't have multiple affiliations in the template, as it makes the name white. Can this be solved? Until then do we go with the first? Last? Most used? user:mathewignash

Ah. I didn't realize that. I get what you're saying about Decepticon - chronologicaly she was one at the latest point in her existance that we know of (Universe). I just think that, as she was a Predacon who turned to the Maximal side in the better known animated series, we should record that info. Regards.SMegatron 11:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Well technically she's a Maximal Protoform who got infected with a Predacon shell program, which was then removed making her a Maximal again, but then the dark influence of Unicron made her join the Decepticon faction serving him, in a maximal body... plus we don't know if Crystal Widow is a new form for her... what a mess! is it possible to make the template default to a different color than white on white in cases where it's a long explanation of affiliation? Or make it list all three? user:mathewignash

I honestly don't know. You know more about infoboxes than me. If there is a way we could display all three that would be great.SMegatron 08:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I found the template and edited it to add a category for Predacon, later Maximal, then Decepticon. As fas as I know Blackarachnia is the only one who would qualify under this group, and I made the colorbar black for it. user:mathewignash

Cool. Nice one.SMegatron 10:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Silver.JPEG

Image:Silver.JPEG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tsblackarachnia.jpg

Image:Tsblackarachnia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with [[WP:FU|faird

Page recreated

I worked on the page off site for while, adding more references, and checking the formatting and double checking the citations. Mathewignash (talk) 22:14, 10 November 2012 (UTC)