Accident, 31 July 2015

edit

I believe that today's accident is notable enough to be mentioned in the article. The aircraft was written off and four people were killed. On current info, it is not notable enough to sustain an independent article (this may change as details emerge). @Lewis Hulbert:, you reverted the addition of referenced info re this. Do you have any comments to make? Mjroots (talk) 17:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Pinging MilborneOne. Mjroots (talk) 18:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
I reverted the additions for both breaking the page layout and reinserting the information. I was in the process of writing something on the talk page but you made the section before me. With four confirmed dead and a complete loss of the plane, I'm sure it would be notable enough for a small mention in the article. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Well, it won't hurt to leave it a few hours to see what details emerge. If rumours are correct, then it may climb the notability scale quite rapidly, hence my earlier note. Accept that it needs properly referencing so that the layout isn't broken, but good faith additions are welcome even if they do temporarily break layouts. These things are easily fixed. Mjroots (talk) 18:06, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
If it is notable and the deaths sadly confirmed then I dont have a problem with a mention, the early stuff on the article was more like a news blog and speculation of what may have happened which was why I removed it. MilborneOne (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
I think today's accident/incident is already notable enough to be recorded on Wikipedia. Dirkbb (talk) 18:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
We have an article - 2015 Blackbushe Airport crash, which is currently at AfD. Mjroots (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Blackbushe Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blackbushe Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Picture on 'Ministry of Civil Aviation' tab should be made smaller

edit

In my opinion, the picture featured on the 'Ministry of Civil Aviation' tab in the article should be made smaller as it mars the alignment of the text within that section of the article, making it look very unprofessional in my opinion. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 11:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

See Next section. MilborneOne (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Picture on 'United States Navy Operations' tab should be made smaller

edit

In my opinion, the picture featured on the 'United States Navy Operations' tab in the article should be made smaller as it mars the alignment of the text within that section of the article, making it look very unprofessional in my opinion. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 11:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, somebody had set the images to a fixed size which we rarely do as the current setting allows readers to set preference on size. MilborneOne (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply