Talk:Blackfriars Rotunda
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Leverian?
editHave to wonder at what point Blackfriars_Rotunda#Disposal_of_the_collection points to the need either to put this info back to the Leverian Museum article? It's getting a way off topic for the Rotunda. Indeed we have an issue with the current article Holophusikon. That (I speculate) is the name of the LM in its Leicester Square incarnation. Would we not be better to have a Leverian Museum article to which Holophusikon redirects, so that we can in the one article talk about the museum in both of its incarnations - Leicester Square and Blackfriars? (I'll cross post some of this on its talk page.) --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Much of the Leverian material is now in Leverian collection. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Blackfriars Rotunda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160819064215/http://www.pastscape.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=401461 to http://www.pastscape.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=401461
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)