Talk:Blackpink/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

This article is well written, provides an overview of the topic, and with suitable sources.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Nkon21 (talk · contribs) 19:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Nominator: Nkon21 (talk · contribs) 19:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Reviewer: Someone who likes maps (talk · contribs) 06:24, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

@Someone who likes maps: this is not a proper GA review 750h+ 07:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)