Talk:Blackpool Zoo

Information about Staffing Policies

Why is it classed as Vandalism to edit something back to the way it was since April regarding the Zoo's treatment of employees? The IP of the user that removed the comments originates at the Zoo - surely allowing them to edit their entry into one that is almost entirely positive is not what Wikipedia is about! —Preceding unsigned comment added by McDodge (talk • contribs)

"This is in the same that the Zoo edits it's own Wikipedia entry to ensure that it recieves no negative publicity" was reverted. The anon edit just happened to make another edit adding the information above before I rolled back the article. If you can provide reliable sources, feel free to add any information you like as long as it's encyclopedic. -- Longhair\^talk 07:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

This page reads like an advert —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.116.11 (talk) 23:45, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ZooDinoLogo.jpg

Image:ZooDinoLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blackpool Zoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120516043125/http://www.blackpoolzoo.org.uk/blog/index.php/2010/05/mayor-opens-sealion-pool/ to http://www.blackpoolzoo.org.uk/blog/index.php/2010/05/mayor-opens-sealion-pool/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120101160521/http://www.blackpoolzoo.org.uk/blog/index.php/2011/02/investment-for-2011-at-blackpool-zoo to http://www.blackpoolzoo.org.uk/blog/index.php/2011/02/investment-for-2011-at-blackpool-zoo/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 21 July 2017 (UTC)