Talk:Blackwater Security Consulting
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Capitalismojo in topic Constellis seems to be a somewhat different company from Blackwater
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blackwater Security Consulting redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Blackwater Security Consulting. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this redirect. You may wish to ask factual questions about Blackwater Security Consulting at the Reference desk. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Initial Discussion
editThis page provides no initial discussion as to the role and mission of Blackwater - Unsigned
- I just added to the page's introduction. I may add more to it later. Tmaull (talk) 16:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Duplicate?
editThis seems to be a duplicate of Academi. --207.215.78.126 (talk) 16:31, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- It is a duplicate of the main article.Capitalismojo (talk) 15:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Constellis seems to be a somewhat different company from Blackwater
editArticles don't seem to be duplicates to me. This article seems to me to act as a good "historical article", preserving a focus on the pre-Xi pre-scandal-airing Blackwater. Apparently that version of Blackwater is supposed to have been "reformed". Only time will tell. I think that this article should be kept as-is, if for no other reason, for the preservation of the "historical record".Scott P. (talk) 14:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Take this to the merge discussion. Capitalismojo (talk) 04:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC)