Talk:Blaschko's lines
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2022 and 27 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wbacius (article contribs).
Article categorization
editThis article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 02:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
editIs there any long term negative effects for having Blaschko's lines?
- Not as far as I know. They don't cause problems in and of themselves. They just cause other symptoms to act strangely. Kafziel Talk 12:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Occurence Rate
editDoes anyone know the occurence rate for these unexplainable lines? In the article it just says they are "extremely rare". WizardofOskemen 23:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Blaschko's lines & Dermatomes
editAre Blaschko's lines & Dermatomes the same thing? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.36.126.123 (talk) 23:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC).
- No, they're quite different. Compare these images: Dermatomes Blaschko —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.23.128 (talk) 10:38, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
I have deleted the dermatomes picture as it is confusing and completely different to the topic at hand. I think until there is a picture that can be used on wikipedia that is correct there should not be a picture of something completely different (YWITH). Just somebody put a link to a picture when available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ywith (talk • contribs) 18:00, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
See also:
editI think there should be a "See also" link to Tabby cat, as they are similar phenomena and could have a related biological cause. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daecon (talk • contribs) 04:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
No Actual Definition
editThis article doesn't actually state what the lines are. The opening statement just defines them as a rare condition -- that doesn't qualify as a definition! What are they? Vertical/horizontal/irregular lines (dark, light, coloured, hairy?) on the skin/hair/eyes? Muscle? I have no idea, this article doesn't actually say. Reidlophile (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Inbuilt into DNA?
editThe part about patterns being "inbuilt into DNA" seems a little ridiculous, especially since it doesn't say what kind of patterns. Please delete it if there's no answer to this soon, since there's no citation. Peachypoh (talk) 10:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- The line was actually, "Blaschko's lines are an invisible pattern built into human DNA." While true (if overly simplistic) I can see how it might be a little unclear. I've made some changes to the article and added inline citations throughout. It's probably still somewhat confusing, but articles on rare and little-understood medical conditions are bound to be somewhat technical. Kafziel Complaint Department 07:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Here's an interesting website about Blaschko's lines that I liked: http://www.thetech.org/genetics/ask.php?id=75 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.216.46.39 (talk) 13:58, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Visible under ultraviolet light?
editI heard that Blaschko's lines were visible under ultraviolet light. Is this true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.147.39 (talk) 06:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- It would be nice if any website that mentions that would provide technical specifics such as the wavelength, how powerful etc. of UV light is required to see the lines, if a person has them. Bizzybody (talk) 21:25, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Blaschko's lines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307051322/http://www.med-ars.it:80/galleries/blaschko.htm to http://www.med-ars.it/galleries/blaschko.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071213021310/http://www.med-ars.it:80/galleries/mosaicism.htm to http://www.med-ars.it/galleries/mosaicism.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724035334/http://www.thetech.org/genetics/ask.php?id=75 to http://www.thetech.org/genetics/ask.php?id=75
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)