Talk:Blazing Lazers/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Prose

• Typo in the lead: "under attack by the an enemy space armada".
• "Every area contains one or more bosses, all which must be destroyed". I prefer "all of which", though "all which" might be OK.
• ""cluster bombs" in which the player can release and destroy large quantities of enemies." Should be either "with which the player can destroy..." or "which the player can release, destroying...". No? Either way, "in" shouldn't be there.
• Computer and Video Games should be italicised, as it is (or at least was) a print magazine.
  • Got them all and then some. I was also using which when I should've been using that, and I didn't use commas when I should have been when which is used to set off clauses (that's what happens when you sumbit something you worked on I suppose—you more easily miss stuff ;) ) MuZemike 16:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Accuracy/Verifiability

• Nitpicking perhaps, but " Throughout the game, players get opportunities to collect additional cluster bombs to replenish their inventory" doesn't have a citation.
  • Removed it. Replaced with a further explanation of the speed function (also on that same page in the manual). MuZemike 16:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Coverage

• Good. Bit light on development info, but if my experience of researching older games is anything to go by, the information probably doesn't exist. Magazines didn't seem much interested in development, other than giving readers previews a month before release. Some contemporary reviews would also be nice, but not strictly essential for GA, IMO.

Neutrality

• Good. Doesn't seem to be any negative criticism of the game quoted, but if everyone really liked it...
  • Judging by the ratings it received, there wouldn't be much at all ;) MuZemike 16:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Stability

• Stable.

Images

• Images are good; FURs are fine. bridies (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)