A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:10, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Bleach(anime)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bleach(anime) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 4#Bleach(anime) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add use of the series during Jeffrey Lamar William's Court Hearing

edit

Bleach and its bount arc were brought in during a well known public court case involving Jeffery Lamar Williams (Also known as Young Thug) as part of the defense argument.

Due to the high profile of the case, as well as how much this was spread on news and social media, this should be brought in even as a slight mention on the article.

We could also create a small section related to the impact of the series on general culture and include this in there. 189.203.252.60 (talk) 20:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

No idea if you're joking or something, but anyway, that would be WP:UNDUE. Xexerss (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

License

edit

My understanding is that when Thousand-Year Blood War came out Disney had acquired the full streaming rights to the anime while Viz continued to kept the home video rights i do not believe Viz has the streaming rights anymore at least in North America as Disney seems to have them while VIZ does continue to have home video rights to the series at least in North America I do however know that Crunchyroll did lose the rights to the anime but not sure who owns the rights to home video in UK or Australia. 71.169.176.42 (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

According to this and this, Viz Media still holds the worldwide rights, while Disney holds streaming rights. As far as I know, Viz Media has not streamed its series directly in a long time, but I don't think this necessarily means that it only holds the home video rights. Xexerss (talk) 20:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Can any information related to The Thousand-Year Blood War be moved into its own page, this is due to the fact that the total counts for both the original show (16 seasons, 366 episodes) and TYBW (29 so far) are separate (as in TYBW is not considered to be season 17) and that Studio Pierrot's website for the show considers it as a separate show and not a continuation of the 2004-2012 series. This is due to the fact that most of the staff involved in the original Bleach moved on to other projects. Aside from that, TYBW has a page but idk if it can be converted into a full show page? VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 23:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

It serves as a sequel to the 2004 series. Of course it is a separate series, which is why it is counted as such in this article, with its own component in the infobox, and nowhere it is referred to as "season 17". I would not opposed to change the structure of the TYBW article, since I'm sure that there must be several sources available to expand it and create production and reception sections, and maybe moving the episodes to a List of Bleach: Thousand-Year Blood War episodes article. However, as it currently is, I don't think it warrants a split for now, given that the current TYBW article serves primarily as a list of episodes with the corresponding summaries, and the rest of the content is not too long and can be perfectly included in this own article. In short, I think that the TYBW article must indeed look like its own article to warrant the split, with sections dedicated to its production, reception, and similar, and not just look like another list article. Xexerss (talk) 01:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply