Talk:Blepharitis

What really is the "most common" form of blepharitis?

The article mentions the "most common" three times, but each time is for a different topic. Can someone clear up the wording?

Fungal treatments for blepharitis

This would need verification and citing, but it does not seem generally supported by the current evidence. Searching PubMed yields just 5 references for "Blepharitis Ketoconazole" (or "Blepharitis Nizorel") in the last 25 years !

1. Derbel M, Benzina Z, Ghorbel I, Abdelmoula S, Makni F, Ayadi A, Feki J (2005). "[Malassezia fungal blepharitis: a case report]". J Fr Ophtalmol. 28 (8): 862–5. PMID 16249768.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - acknowledges "the role of certain mycoses in the etiopathogenesis of blepharitis remains controversial"
2. Maichuk IuF, Lapshina NA, Diadina UV (1991). "[Imidazoles in the treatment of ocular mycoses]". Antibiot Khimioter. 36 (1): 45–6. PMID 1905126.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - listing summary of a number of trials and totally just 40 patients - hardly common
3. Nelson ME, Midgley G, Blatchford NR (1990). "Ketoconazole in the treatment of blepharitis". Eye. 4 ( Pt 1): 151–9. PMID 2138985.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - "Ketoconazole was no better than placebo at improving the symptoms of blepharitis."
4. Rysselaere M (1983). "Blepharitis by Microsporum canis". Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 207: 93–6. PMID 6093916. - is a case report, but has no PubMed summary
5. Rodenbiker HT, Ganley JP (1980). "Ocular coccidioidomycosis". Surv Ophthalmol. 24 (5): 263–90. PMID 6988997. - describes fungal infection of the eye itself, rather than external eyelid problem.

So please cite evidence either that dermatologists commonly recomend such treatment (its not on Moorfields Eye Hospital's info sheet) or studies of effectiveness. David Ruben ^Talk 19:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Why would we cite evidence that dermatologists recommend such treatment? The text you deleted states that dermatologist DO NOT currently recommend such treatment for Blepharitis. Rather, it says that they recommend it for Seb. Derm., but NOT for Seb. Bleph. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.74.167.71 (talk) 07:30, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't forget Rosacea associated blepharatis - the most common variant

Most of the thinking in regards to blepharitis has undergone a transformation in the last decade. Many people are of the opinion that the most typical form of blepharitis has little to do with colonizing bacteria and everything to do with an immune overeaction at the oil gland outlets (meibomian glands). Blepharitis is commonly found in association with acne rosacea and it is belived that the same glandular inflamatory process that affects the facial skin is affecting the lid skin.

The most high yield treatment for this type of rosacea associated blepharitis is warm compress - lid scrubbing with shampoo seems to make little difference. Use of antibiotic is mostly uneccessary and occasionally harmful when toxicity develops to the medication. The use of lubrication such as artificial tears is also a mainstay of therapy.

Resistant cases are treated with topical stearoid preparations for a limited interval and sometimes oral agents in the tetracycline family (tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline) can be very effective both for the blepharatis and rosacea.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.207.24.95 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC).

How to lists

recommend linking out to "eyelid" care topic. Wikipedia is NOT a how-to guide —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindendoss (talk • contribs) 23:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

picture of a chalazion is incorrect - the picture is a external hordeolum 47.22.5.6 (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:30, 28 November 2015 (UTC)