Talk:Block design test

"Accordingly Felder at North Carolina State University has developed a learning style questionnaire that attempts to assess spatial ability in an educational context."

The test is a forced-dichotomy list of "I tend to" questions. In no way does it reference the block design test or attempt to directly assess spatial ability vis-a-vis education. The link given is a link to the test itself, not a study analysis or statement relating the test to the block design test or spatial ability. It doesn't seem to me to belong in the "Science and engineering aptitude" section (though that's better than where it currently is). IMO it needs further explanation for why it belongs where it was put in this article. Until then, I'm moving it down to the bottom under a new section. --99.23.76.63 (talk) 20:56, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing

You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 20:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Block design test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070722125405/http://visualspatial.org/Articles/idvsls.pdf to http://www.visualspatial.org/Articles/idvsls.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070710160743/http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk:80/id/JAP%20visual-spatial%20abilities%20of%20pilots.pdf to http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/id/JAP%20visual-spatial%20abilities%20of%20pilots.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)