Talk:Blood Quran

Citation?

On the one hand, it is regarded as haraam (sinful) to write out the Qur'an in blood.

Citation needed? Was it decreed so by a religious leader? Past or present? None of the pre-invasion articles mention it being haraam, and none of the later articles say who or why it's been condemned. Is this a political football? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.24.63 (talk) 20:26, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

On the other hand, it is also forbidden to defile or deface copies of the Qur'an.

Also needs a citation as there are sanctioned ways to destroy a Quran when necessary. This is also misleading as it has nothing to do with the debate over whether to destroy it or not. As the second paragraph states it's largely an issue over whether Saddam should be wiped from history or remembered as a tyrant.

Some photos would be nice

Are any public domain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.149.187.98 (talk) 23:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 22:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

---

Blood Quran → Blood Qur'an – Correct orthography, used consistently throughout entire article. Relisted. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC) Impsswoon (talk) 09:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

• Comment - yes but WP:TITLEs have different guidelines, WP:COMMONNAME. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose since our article is at Quran. Hot Stop 13:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose. In English we use Quran, not Qur'an. Zarcadia (talk) 13:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

If that is the case should all the instances of Qur'an be moved to Quran? At the very least I find it odd that a link to the Quran article is using Qur'an.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 17:18, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

• Is this an ENGVAR issue? In any case, I'd suggest listing it at Talk:Quran first. Red Slash 00:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Comment i would support this if Quran got moved, but i suggest to not go there — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.175.135 (talk) 20:37, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blood Quran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320174022/http://www.arabicnews.com:80/ansub/Daily/Day/040205/2004020502.html to http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/040205/2004020502.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320175413/http://www.arabicnews.com:80/ansub/Daily/Day/000926/2000092622.html to http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/000926/2000092622.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Umm al-Maarik Mosque crop.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)