Talk:Blood of the Prophets

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Latter Day Saint movement Low‑importance

	Latter Day Saint movement portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Blood of the Prophets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Blood of the Prophets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oupress.com/awardbooks.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.umsl.edu/~wha/awards/winners.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081226141420/http://history.denverlibrary.org/about/bancroft.html to http://history.denverlibrary.org/about/bancroft.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oupress.com/bookdetail.asp?isbn=0-8061-3639-1
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090210215036/http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=review&id=509 to http://farms.byu.edu/display.php?table=review&id=509

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Criticism section is problematic

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The contents of the criticism section appear to be wholly sourced to LDS-associated groups. It's fine to mention that the LDS do not appreciate the book, but it is now presented as if this is mainstream criticism - it is not. This section needs to be reworked. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Since there has been no response, I have made some changes myself. I have not removed any of the criticism, but added some context (e.g., that all such criticism given is taken from sources directly linked to the LDS church) and changed some wordings that presented allegations in such criticism as unimpeachable facts to more neutral wordings. If anyone disagrees, I would be happy to see suggestions for improving the section. 82.176.221.176 (talk) 10:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic