Talk:Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson

The synopsis is nothing but a verbatim copy of the liner notes from the musical CD. Is that legit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.64.110.158 (talk) 17:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

This new user did not create the article with sources, but the play does appear to be notable. [1], [2]
At the least, not a speedy. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 19:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC).Reply

Possible Deletion

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't know what can be done to update or better this page. It's being contested for the second time and I have no clue as to why... Once again I will state that this musical IS generating alot of buzz in the LA theatre seen, IS being put on by the most famous theater company in LA (responsible for multiple tony award winning productions Like Angels In America), IS being directed by Alex Timbers, whose work has won him an Obie and garnered two Drama Desk Award nominations...

If you still consider it bull, then your all pretentious elitists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.170.214.210 (talk) 21:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Update... this section, despite its poor attitude, seems to be moot now. The show is opening on Broadway in a few weeks, which ought to seal its place in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.68.151.16 (talk) 02:53, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

For the record the prod was here.18:00, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Neutrality

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Certain statements about the treatment of Native American history in this musical are misleading. While this is obviously a sensitive issue, it is equally wrong to misrepresent the problem as it is to ignore it.

The sentences in question: "The play is a satire and therefore, does not reflect an historically accurate portrayal of the political and American Indian leaders depicted. The historical facts about Indian Removal under Andrew Jackson are marginalized into order to ensure that the theater-goer experiences a fast and fun ride through what is one of the bloodiest periods in American history."

(The first sentence is of course wholly true -- of course the play is not historically accurate -- but it is used as a misleading segue into the second.)

The use of the word "marginalized" is particularly biased, as it implies that the musical somehow dismisses, ignores, or apologizes for the Indian Removal Acts. And there is NO basis offered whatsoever for the creators' desire to ensure "a fast and fun ride through what is one of the bloodiest periods in American history."

In fact, one of the major concerns of the musical is Jackson's treatment of American Indians, which is depicted as atrocity based in cruel bigotry. Yes, there are laughs and loud music mixed in along the way, but this is arguably to make the reality of genocide more chilling when it is confronted seriously near the end of the show.

^ Andrew Jackson hunted down Black Slaves in the Florida Swamps who were running away seeking freedom from their masters. Either that or he returned them to bondage. We must never forget that Jackson was an Extremely Bloody Oppressor, an unrepentant Slave Owner from the South who sometimes used them for his sexual escapades while being portrayed as a supposed military hero.

In any case, support is needed for these heavily opinionated statements, and a more neutral view should be given. Yes, there are historical inaccuracies in the depiction of Native American history; no, these are not made for the sake of "marginalizing" Jackson's horrendous mistreatment, coercion, and murder of indigenous American peoples. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.68.151.16 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 7 September 2010

I removed the prod as these issues to have been addressed.Americasroof (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Plagiarism

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The "Synopsis" section (with the exception of the last sentence) has been copied in it's entirety from the liner notes synopsis included with the cast recording. Should this be deleted? Patrickmcg (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:06, 31 December 2010 (UTC).Reply

I have done my best to clean up and better summarize the show.Rebelpilot (talk) 16:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080228215152/http://www.centertheatregroup.org/tickets/productiondetail.aspx?id=3198 to http://www.centertheatregroup.org/tickets/productiondetail.aspx?id=3198
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080228215152/http://www.centertheatregroup.org/tickets/productiondetail.aspx?id=3198 to http://www.centertheatregroup.org/tickets/productiondetail.aspx?id=3198
Corrected formatting/usage for http://publictheater.org/component/option%2Ccom_shows/task%2Cview/Itemid%2C141/id%2C1005
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.knowtheatre.com/shows/bloodybloodyandrewjackson.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic