Talk:Blue (NFL mascot)

Fair use rationale for Image:Indianapolis Blue.jpg

Image:Indianapolis Blue.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

The rating for this article.

Is there anyway I could upgrade the rating of this article, please? I think with the new information I added about Blue, this article should be rated higher than "Stub Class", and should possibly be given a "High Importance" rating. Mr. Brain (talk) 06:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Blue (NFL mascot)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Judging by the improvements I tried to make by expanding the information about Blue, I think this article should be upgraded from stub-level to a higher level than stub. I don't know if it's able to be upgraded to a high improtance level, but I think it's worth a shot. Mr. Brain (talk) 04:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC) Even without the references? ZappaOMati 16:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Last edited at 16:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 09:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)