Talk:Blue Hawk Mine
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
editCyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://charette.no-ip.com:81/images/2004_06/BlueHawkMine/
- Triggered by
\bno-ip\.
on the global blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:05, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Blue Hawk Mine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030821215301/http://www.em.gov.bc.ca:80/cf/minfile/search/search.cfm?mode=capbib&minfilno=082ENW002 to http://www.em.gov.bc.ca/cf/minfile/search/search.cfm?mode=capbib&minfilno=082ENW002
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.em.gov.bc.ca/cf/aris/search/search.cfm?mode=repsum&rep_no=23811 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.em.gov.bc.ca/cf/aris/search/search.cfm?mode=repsum&rep_no=27447
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Confusing photographs
editat the end of paragraph three are two links labelled first and second which display photographs. There is no caption for the photographs and no apparent reason why they have been inserted in this way. If they are truly relevant to the article, they ought to be included, along with explanation of what the reader is seeing. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 03:19, 22 May 2023 (UTC)