two separate articles?

edit

It seems that the urban legend issue with temporary tattoos and the historically accurate use of permanent tattoos by the lesbian community are unrelated. Just because they both involve blue stars is a bit tenuous of a connection. If there were more issues surrounding blue stars, perhaps, but the second example does not constitute a "legend." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.247.51 (talk) 01:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


edit

The image Image:Mickey mouse acid warning.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply