Talk:Blueberry muffin baby

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2021 and 20 November 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Medicalendeavor. Peer reviewers: Rebjmcd.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blueberry muffin baby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120711041046/http://anagen.ucdavis.edu:80/142/case_reports/blueberry/mehta.html to http://anagen.ucdavis.edu/142/case_reports/blueberry/mehta.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Plans for Edit

This is a stub-class article with need for further added content.

Strengths of current article: The tone is neutral and sources seem to come from reputable sources. Image is helpful in enhancing understanding of the topic. A general definition of a blueberry muffin baby is provided.

Plans for improvement to article: I plan to expand on the causes, epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment behind this topic. I also plan to modify the lead section to include the the the most common causes of a blueberry muffin baby as well as the general pathophysiology behind the characteristic lesions. Article is well-organized but lacks important content/sections.

Please feel free to provide constructive input as these edits are being made. Thank you!

Best, Medicalendeavor (talk) 22:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Medicalendeavor

Peer Review

I think Medicalendeavor has made their edits on the page itself, rather than transferring from sandbox to live article, though I'm not sure.

The lead gives a nice overview of "Blueberry muffin baby" etiology in name. Perhaps the lead could have summary sentences for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. A sentence each could be beneficial as quick overview for the lead section. The picture in the info box is great. Personal preference: add a period to the caption.

Pathophys section: This is a helpful section to have. It may be helpful to internally link "hematopoiesis" to its page, in case readers are unaware of what hematopoiesis is. Similarly, linking macules and papules could be beneficial as well.

Causes section: The causes section is very well organized. Again, I think incorporating internal links to the respective pages would be helpful. I really like the breakdown of causes.

Diagnosis section: At first, I thought this section was too long. However, I appreciate the summarized examples of diagnostic conditions for various causes. It was not too overwhelming. Again, incorporating links will be helpful.

Prognosis section: Well done. I don't have suggestions for this section.

Treatment section: Well done Concise. I really liked this section and feel it represents Wikipedia and its goals well.

References: Strong references.

Overall, a great job. Main takeaways: incorporate links and provide sentence for each article section in lead. Rebjmcd (talk) 23:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Reply to Peer Review

Thank you @Rebjmcd for the helpful suggestions! I added more internal links and made more improvements based on your suggestions! I appreciate the feedback.

Best, Medicalendeavor (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2021 (UTC)