Talk:Blueprint (CSS framework)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

The first thing that most people would want to know is: How much of this is free, how much is open source, what is the license and what products do you need to pay for. The main Blueprint CSS site seems to obscure this. If you click on "download", there is a link on that page for pricing etc. I've nothing against commercial software, but it saves a lot of time wasting if that all-important status is made clear from the start. Especially on a Wikipedia page.

The only pricing link I see belongs to the hosting site, github, and describes its hosting pricing. It has nothing to do with Blueprint and I don't think that github's probably misleading links are worth mentioning in this article. Blueprint is completely free software as far as I see, and I have added that to the article. --88.76.83.96 (talk) 22:51, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blueprint (CSS framework). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply