Talk:Blurb, Inc.

Latest comment: 5 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress

Sorry for the confusion. Im going to do this first by removing the advertising that doesn't belong anywhere, and then by proposing a merge of the software article in to this one. Since it is the sole product, you cant reasonably have two articles on it. DGG 03:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Conflicting stats in the History section?

edit

The first paragraph reports that Blurb has delivered more than 14 million books published by "over half a million" customers, but then the third paragraph states Blurb's "two million" customers have published "8 million" books. I guess these are probably both accurate and taken from different points in time, but it reads pretty confusingly here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.194.39.67 (talk) 20:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Blurb a publisher?

edit

Blurb is a printing service for self-published works - Publishing is the process of production **and dissemination*** of literature or information. Blurb does not disseminate the works. The customers of the printer and layout-service publish themselves.(E-Kartoffel (talk) 07:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC))Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blurb, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

This whole article reads like an ad

edit

Hello, random Internet schmuck here. This entire article (not the talk page, dummy!) reads like corporate ad copy. Ugh. Maybe someone around here could at least flag it as such, if not clean it up? If need be, this particular random Internet schmuck may be contacted at laserhawk64@gmail.com. TIA. 174.193.132.152 (talk) 19:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Booksmart (film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:18, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Reply