Talk:Blurryface

Add

Music Videos - Stressed Out on YouTube

Singles -Stressed Out on the 28th of April 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tayalltimelow (talk • contribs) 10:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Would it be possible for someone to add more information regarding the "Title and artwork" section? I found an interview with the group where they revealed information that I feel fits within the scope of the article and should be present. Here is the URL for the information: https://www.rockurlife.net/interview/english/twenty-one-pilots-17-06-15

FlashyBoy2798 (talk) 00:42, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2016

please add their total album sales WW it is...1,026,000 according to mediatraffic ive been tracking the total since 1st week.. Leorochefort04 (talk) 03:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 18:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blurryface. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.altpress.com/reviews/entry/review_twenty_one_pilots_blurryface
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160118081119/http://hitlisten.nu/default.asp?list=a40 to http://hitlisten.nu/default.asp?list=a40

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blurryface. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130424132036/http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16771 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16771
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160104162203/http://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2749412/ to http://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2749412/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blurryface. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150519062243/https://www.jbhifi.com.au/music/browse/alternative/blurryface/699383/ to https://www.jbhifi.com.au/music/browse/alternative/blurryface/699383/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Genre and influences

@Bowling is life: I’m not even sure if you read the template but it states “The field should include the music genre(s) that best describes the album.” of all sources that are included the only ones that best describe the album are Alternative hip hop, electropop, and indie pop; all other genres are just influences / elements. So am I really confused on why you reverted it when even in the lead it states those genres as influences. Plus I reviewed all the sources and they all state those genres just include songs in that genre — not that the album is that certain genre. I’m very much convinced you didn’t even review the sources because this is most definitely not a reggae album as others. Pillowdelight (talk) 12:27, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@Pillowdelight: Sorry it took me a while to respond. I have been busy all day. I should have looked at the sources instead of reverting. I thought the sources supported the genres. However, I think we should find sources that call the album these genres before we remove them. Bowling is life (talk) 01:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@Bowling is life: That’s okay. The only source that clarifies the genres for the Infobox is this one [1], which are alternative hip hop, electropop, and indie pop. You could also look at WP:EXPLICITGENRES for examples. I can move the genres and sources around and create a “Composition” and add them there. Pillowdelight (talk) 02:05, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@Pillowdelight: The Billboard source says: "Blurryface is brimming with reggae." That sounds explicit enough. We'll have to find replacements for the other genres or remove them. Creating a composition is a good idea. Bowling is life (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

@Bowling is life: Alright, I can come to an agreement on that after googling what brimming meant, never heard that word before. I will start to create the composition. I removed Indie Rock as that genre wasn’t even mentioned within the source that was included. Please let me know if you think it’s good enough. Thank you! Pillowdelight (talk) 02:39, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

@Pillowdelight:@Bowling is life: Hello, I was invited to this discussion by Pillowdelight. Sorry for the delay, I have little free time. I think the four genres in the infobox are well sourced. "Brimming with reggae" suggests that this album is "full of reggae". Blueberry72 (talk) 20:37, 21 September 2022 (UTC)