Talk:BoRit Asbestos
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did You Know Nomination
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from BoRit Asbestos appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did You Know Nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the 1.5 million cubic yards of asbestos waste at the BoRit Asbestos Superfund site in Ambler, Pennsylvania was known colloquially as the "White Mountains" by local residents? Source: Samson Reiny, Living in the Town Asbestos Built, Distillations Magazine, 2015, volume 1, issue 2, pages 26–35
- ALT1:... that the BoRit Asbestos Superfund site in Ambler, Pennsylvania is the second largest asbestos dump in the United States? Source: Jessica McDonald, Penn researchers get $10 million grant to study asbestos in Ambler, www.whyy.org
- ALT2:... that the BoRit Asbestos waste pile created by manufacturers Keasbey and Mattison and Turner & Newhall was 25 feet high and covered 2 1/2 acres?Source: Samson Reiny, Living in the Town Asbestos Built, Distillations Magazine, 2015, volume 1, issue 2, pages 26–35
5x expanded by Dwkaminski (talk). Self-nominated at 14:52, 17 January 2021 (UTC).
- Size and date check out; article is properly cited to reliable sources; hook proposals verifiable - prefer the "original" hook - spot checks show OK for CPR/copyvio; Earwig does show one with a high percentage match but it is a government and thus public-domain source so at that level I believe it is fine. I believe this is good to go. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)