Talk:Bo Diddley (Bo Diddley song)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Bo Diddley (Bo Diddley song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116164728/http://www.rockhall.com/hof/inductee.asp?id=88 to http://www.rockhall.com/hof/inductee.asp?id=88
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 28 May 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 16:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Bo Diddley (song) → Bo Diddley (Bo Diddley song) – per WP:DISAMBIGUATION and WP:SONGDAB as we now also have Bo Diddley (Arvingarna song). In ictu oculi (talk) 10:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:09, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and Ortizesp. Bo Diddley (song) should redirect to Bo Diddley (disambiguation). —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 16:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. The other song is too obscure to block this from being the primary topic. I'm not even sure it meets our notability standards. -- Calidum 18:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- It charted pretty high in Sweden. It was also featured in Melodifestivalen, so I imagine it got some press from that. I would say it meets WP:NSONG. 162 etc. (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- The article is a stub lacking coverage to meet NSONG at the moment. I'd take it to AFD, but that might be considered POINTY at this point. -- Calidum 19:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- It charted pretty high in Sweden. It was also featured in Melodifestivalen, so I imagine it got some press from that. I would say it meets WP:NSONG. 162 etc. (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- But the Bo Diddley (disambiguation) page already has a primary topic listed at its top — Bo Diddley. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:23, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure Calidum meant primary in the WP:PDAB sense, ie. the status quo. 162 etc. (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- There is no primary song in the WP:PRIMARYSONG sense. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- PDAB takes precedent. You can't ignore it because you disagree with it. -- Calidum 15:36, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- There is no primary song in the WP:PRIMARYSONG sense. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure Calidum meant primary in the WP:PDAB sense, ie. the status quo. 162 etc. (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Recording too long?
editThe recording is 30 seconds, a fifth of the song's length. Will this cause legal issues with copyright? OneToZero (talk) 00:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)