Talk:Bo McMillin
Bo McMillin has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 27, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bo McMillin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110519114414/http://www.centre.edu/web/library/ency/m/mcmillin.html to http://www.centre.edu/web/library/ency/m/mcmillin.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080908094541/http://www.geneva.edu/object/athletics_footballmediaguide.html to http://www.geneva.edu/object/athletics_footballmediaguide.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Second archived link brings up a 404. Lizard (talk) 00:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Bo McMillin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- The infobox image needs a caption Done
- ""Bo" as a child was known as one to pick fights" - try As a child, Bo was known to pick fights (not sure if "Bo" needs quotation marks) Done
- "In McMillin's day of iron man football, he was also a safety man on defense and a kick returner on special teams." - this needs a citation Done
- "During his freshman year, McMillin was also on the track team; on April 27, 1917, he won the 220-yard dash at a Centre interscholastic track meet." - this too needs a citation . Hard to find one - the citation seems to be the medal
- " the five man backfield and the cockeyed T" - I have no idea what this means! Done That's why they are called negligible. I added an explanatory note. Not sure what was "cockeyed" about it myself.
- The second paragraph in the Kansas State section needs a citation Done
- Ref 1, 64 and 65 are missing access dates Done
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No original research found.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This was an interesting read. The article is well written and comprehensive, so once all of those minor issues are clarified then this should be good to go. JAGUAR 13:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks again. Any better?
- Thanks for addressing them! I've just checked through it again and it meets the criteria, so I'll promote this now JAGUAR 21:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bo McMillin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304094720/http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/conference_champs/champions.php?conid=96 to http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/conference_champs/champions.php?conid=96
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303200055/http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/coaching/alltime_coach_game_by_game.php?coachid=1571&year=1931 to http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/coaching/alltime_coach_game_by_game.php?coachid=1571&year=1931
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 22 July 2017 (UTC)