| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Untitled
editThis is the most insulting article I ever read about Bob Kinnear and It should be removed
Marcoagg1 (talk) 23:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- This was the version you saw, I assume? That was vandalism, which has since been reverted. If you see something as inappropriate as that, feel free to remove it yourself. Dreaded Walrus t c 11:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC) (all bad versions, including the one linked, have now been rightly deleted. Dreaded Walrus t c 16:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC))
While maintaining neutrality I added a section at least acknowledging the fact that there has been some controversy, and tried to provide context by including the list of job actions he has been involved in while head of the ATU 113. I also provided context with reference to a document released from him by the union regarding the safety of his workers.--Eja2k (talk) 02:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Also did a minor and removed dead links in the further reading section --Eja2k (talk) 17:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Strikes
editChange the Viva from 2011 to 2011-Jan 2012 70.40.153.48 (talk) 23:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)