Talk:Bob de Moor

Citation needed or would this be copyright infringement?

Whole sentences, and in one case most of a paragraph of this Web page:

http://bobdemoor.canalblog.com/archives/2006/05/25/1952140.html

were used in the first French Wiki article (without citation) here:

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_de_Moor

and apparently translated into the first Wiki English article (also without citation):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_de_Moor

Another question. It's not clear who origially wrote the non-Wiki version of the text, since the same words are used on several Web sites. If a citation were to be needed, would this cause a problem? Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 13:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

The page you linked to claims that the article comes from [1], which seems quite possible. It is indeed a copyvio, so the normal thing to do would be / will be to completely delete the article (since all versions since the first have this problem), and start again from scratch. That's a pity, since we will lose a lot of work, but I don't think it can be helped. I'll delete the page, I'll let you have the honour of rcereating it (if you feel like it), and I'll see how much I can contribute to it. Could you drop a note on the French Wikipedia as well?

Oh, and thanks for pointing this out, such things are important. Fram 13:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, Fram. That makes sense. I'd enjoy writing the new Bob de Moor page, but I'm not the appropriate person, since most of what I know about him relates to his work on Tintin. The general outline of the original article seemed satisfactory, although perhaps lacking in quotes about Bob de Moor's artistic perspective on his work. If I can help in any other way, I will.

I'll definitely drop a line to the French Wiki.Alpha Ralpha Boulevard 14:22, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Have fun. In order to avoid image orphanage and link dwindeling while stuff was still fresh, I put back up the work I did that is verily not copyvio. MURGH ^disc. 15:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bob de Moor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204152041/http://www.bdparadisio.com/scripts/detail.cfm?Id=301 to http://www.bdparadisio.com/scripts/detail.cfm?Id=301

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Name

The last name is spelled as De Moor. The title should be changed in Bob De Moor. Happytravels (talk) 22:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

De Lustige Kapoentjes

Why is there no mention of Bob's crucial role in the history of De Lustige Kapoentjes? Jan olieslagers (talk) 18:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)