Talk:Bobby Blake

Latest comment: 4 years ago by AlejandroLeloirRey in topic afd?

Fair use rationale for Image:Black ripped stripped dvd.jpg

edit
 

Image:Black ripped stripped dvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Get hooked on this.jpg

edit
 

Image:Get hooked on this.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Factual Slips in Autobigraphy

edit

Though I enjoyed Mr. Blake's autobiography, he tells some white lies in it. At one point, he says he is bisexual and has two sons. Later, he admits that he has a young mentor who has a lover and that he calls them his "two sons." He says he's getting a law degree. Later he admits that he is trying to finish and undergraduate degree and HOPES to go to law school. These stretches make me wonder if other statements in his book were lies. I wonder if he uses hyperbole to work alongside his braggadocio (sp?). If someone writes an entry for his autobiography, she or he should keep these matters in mind. jcm 8/26/8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chumley41 (talkcontribs) 18:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reference

edit

There is a paragraph about Bobby Blake in the October 2007 edition of the Center Happenings newsletter (Volume 23, Issue 9). It is mostly to promote an event where he will be talking about his book on October 18. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KidBohemia (talkcontribs) 14:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bobby Blake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobby Blake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobby Blake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

afd?

edit

Hallo, i am considering of nominating this bio for deletion. the sources are: bis own biografy, IAFD, an article on Tabernacle Baptist Church which loos like co-written by him, Tim Dean, Unlimited Intimacy: Reflections on the Subculture of Barebacking (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2009), 157 which looks like a mere mention and a book published by STARbooks Press. it looks like to me there is really nothing that proves notability. can you please let me know what you think? thank you. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 17:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply