![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Clean-up
editWas carelessly written in a peacock style eg WQS not explained, no trace on website of claimed environmental caring (of which one fund was given as Reek Check, possibly an error for Reef Check}. Perhaps should be considered for deletion.--SilasW 20:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Now it looks like it was just copypasted from their website. Could be a copyvio. -- Ϫ 19:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- The company is significant enough that I think the article should stay. Clearly, though, it needs work and references. Alanraywiki (talk) 19:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)