Talk:Body adiposity index

{{technical}} tag

I added a {{technical}} tag because of the statistical content.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Body adiposity index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110306135310/http://www.ottawacitizen.com:80/health/Better+than+obesity+scale+proposed/4378908/story.html to http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/Better+than+obesity+scale+proposed/4378908/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

The Formula Is Wrong

If you check the original reference by Bergman et al, you will see that the formula for the Adiposity Index is incorrect. It should be hip circumference / (Height^1.5 - 18). The -18 refers to the denominator only. Sorry I don't know how to fix this, just letting you know so someone can make this change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.33.97.43 (talk) 04:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

The previous poster is probably referring to the abstract contained in page. While the profusion of parentheses makes the formula hard to read, if one counts the parentheses carefully one will see that the 18 subtracts the whole index. Reading the full article, this is so that the index will approximate percent body fat in the patient.

In summary, the formula is correct. --2804:14D:5C51:9DEE:153D:CFA4:3A3:A3D4 (talk) 23:18, 2 December 2019 (UTC)