Talk:Boeing 717
Latest comment: 1 year ago by RickyCourtney in topic Problems with recent edit (reverted and re-reverted)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boeing 717 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2 |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
 | Boeing 717 received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Problems with recent edit (reverted and re-reverted)
edit"With the 1997 merger taking prior to production..." - grammatically incorrect (taking place? happening?)
"...design range of 2,060 nautical miles [nmi] (3,820 km; 2,370 mi)." -- nautical miles was already spelled out and linked by the unit conversion template, what is the nmi in square brackets even doing here?
In the lead, "broader DC-9 family" is redundant, making the lead longer for no good reason. (if it is a product family, of course it includes other models).
Fbergo (talk) 00:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- 1) Fair point. Changed.
- 2) nmi is a rare unit of measure outside of aviation, for a generalist encyclopedia I felt it helpful to clarify the abbreviation at first usage.
- 3) Agreed it’s a bit clunky, but it’s also the way most of the DC-9 pages are worded. RickyCourtney (talk) 04:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)