MH-6 Little Bird

edit

This is not a merge proposal, but just a question: Would the content on this page be better off if it were to be merged with the MH-6 Little Bird page? They seem to be the same basic airframe, and the MELB is certainly based on the MH-6M. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I had considered that when I created it, but the original ULB was a 530, not a MH-6, and I tried to cover all the aspects of the program. In fact, it could be argued that the real subject is the technology itself, which is designed to be installed in any airframe, and they just happened to pick the 530 and MH-6 to demo it. Basically it was one of those awkward situations where the article could fit in different places, but because it overs a range of subjects, in the end I elected to let it stand alone. However, if others in the project feel strongly about putting this stuff in another article, or renaming it, it won't bother me. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 13:14, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Alan. From what I can tell, the lastest MH-6M that is covered in the MH--6 aritcle is based on the MD 530, and the MELB is besed on voth of them. It's on that basis that I thought it might be best to merge this article to the MH-6 page. - BillCJ (talk) 18:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Of course, the ULB/MELB is a Boeing product, as is the new AH-6 offering, Keeping the Boeing products here might make the best sense. - BillCJ (talk) 19:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Given that this page now covers the AH-6X MELB, the ULB, and the new AH-6S, I've moved the article to Boeing AH-6. It's also a little shorter! - BillCJ (talk) 21:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

ARH offerings

edit

Boeing is calling its current AH-6 product for ARH "AH-6S Phoenix". They have an Apache "lite" offering. See Boeing Offers Army Two ARH Alternatives (Av Week) and Boeing's new Phoenix rises from ARH ashes (FI) for more info. Also, the version offered foe export last fall is the AH-6I. The AH-6S is going to be stretched and improved with AH-64 Block III hardware and systems. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

An Boeing-registered IP user added info to the OH-6 Cayuse page in the AH-6S. I moved a portion of that here, but did not keep most of it as it was copied verbatim from the FI story. I don't have time to rewrite it now, but I also didn't want to leave in text that I knew was a copyvio. - BillCJ (talk) 21:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Bill. Seems premature to write much as this stage. The Army could put an RFP that means changes to the AH-6S or the Apache Light is offered. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I reverted the OH-6 page to no avail. I rewrote the AH-6S text here. Don't feel like reverting the OH-6 article again.. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Move

edit

This article is about variants of the AH-6, not the AH-6 itself. I think it should be under a title that reflects that, but I'm unsure which title to use. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 18:14, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

This article covers Boeing recent H-6 versions. "Boeing AH-6" is a good, simple name for that. These versions include the Unmanned Little Bird, and proposed AH-6S and AH-6I manned versions. The AH-6 versions are covered at the bottom of the 'Design and development' section and Variants section. I don't see an issue... -Fnlayson (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

America789: Please stop reverting...

edit

...and start to think. An already only theoretically "payload" - the diff between MTOW and empty weight is not usable - first roughly doubled, then increased by factor 10 ?? Factors higher then the MTOW ? Obviously a typo. Or if you can't understand figures: compare Sikorsky CH-53 Sea Stallion, Boeing CH-47 Chinook: does it look like this?

Ironically this heli is even called "Little Bird": Do you have a glue what 25,000 lb payload means? Quite "Big Bird".

If you are not able to see, the formal Wikipedia rules: Your source is disputed. Tagremover (talk) 09:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.army-technology.com/projects/littlebirdhelicopter/
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Name and Redirection Problems

edit

AH-6 Little Bird redirects here. Most people looking for data on the AH-6 are probably looking for information on the development and operational use of the AH-6 by 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment. That information is all on the MH-6 page. There's a mention of the AH-6 MELB here, but nothing to explain that Mission Enhanced Little Bird was a common programme across AH-6 and MH-6 and that AH-6M and MH-6M are now in operational service. That information is on the MH-6 page. This page is great for the Unmanned Little Bird, but it really doesn't cover the AH-6. Recommendation: rename this to Unmanned Little Bird, move all AH-6 related content to the MH-6 article, ensure AH-6 and AH-6 Little Bird redirect there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.122.84 (talk) 14:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Having just searched for the original Little Bird and finding this page instead, I agree this is somewhat confusing. I don't think any content needs to be moved, but a note at the top of the page mentioning that "this is the Boeing new-ish AH-6; for the oldish AH-6 Little Bird, see MH-6" might help. (...maybe use better terms than "oldish/newish"). Cheers! Skyraider1 (talk) 01:48, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Boeing AH-6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Boeing AH-6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Nagasaki Buzzard Attack Chopper (attack helicopter) (Grand Theft Auto V) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 10 § Nagasaki Buzzard Attack Chopper (attack helicopter) (Grand Theft Auto V) until a consensus is reached. Blethering Scot 20:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply